I wouldn’t call it a waste of time, but Cloverfield proved to be rather disappointing. Since I’ve been in a bullet-point mood lately, let’s break it down thusly:
- Acting: Okay.
- Big monster: Eh. (Spoiler.) Shoot out his fucking breathing sacks and get it over with already.
- Small monsters: Kinda scary at first, but cease to be as soon as you think “oh, they kind of look like crabs.” Mmmm, crabs.
- NYC hipster body count: High. (Spoiler.) It would have been nice of them to kill off Hud a bit earlier, though. Like at the beginning of the fucking movie.
- Gratuitous references to 9/11: Too many to count.
- Incidences of military personnel saying really cliché things: Numerous.
- Likeliness of monster taking a Godzilla-like place in American culture: Almost none, thank god. And if it does, I’m going to have to bust some fucking heads.
- J.J. Abrams: In serious need of a tire iron to the side of the skull before he tries to top himself. Who knows, if he suffers some in the process, maybe his art will get a bit better.
After watching Cloverfield, I find myself concerned that he’s going to screw up the new Star Trek movie, and I don’t even care about that franchise. Still, I’d have to rate Cloverfield a 5 out of 10, as it was moderately entertaining upon first viewing.
But what about a second viewing? I don’t even want to go there.
Hud was the only person in that movie that gave it some life. Otherwise it was pretty much Felicity + Monster = Crap.
Comment by L — 20080528 - Wednesday @ 6:57 am